Royal Philips Has A Long Standing And Rich History

Royal Philips Laure Santiago Palm Beach State College Abstract This paper was written to research Royal Philips. In the research we will find that Royal Philips has a long-standing and rich history. We will discuss the diverse products that Philips has invented over the last one-hundred and twenty-five years. Competitor information, industry and market segment will be topics that are addressed in detail. The organizations financials will be provided. A SWOT analysis will be conducted and the strengths and weaknesses of the company will be presented. And finally, recommendations based on information from the company’s SWOT analysis will be revealed. Chapter 1: Research Proposal and Introduction Overview The research conducted will provide information about the history of Royal Philips, the diversification of the company and its products since the company’s founding in 1891. The family founded company has a long standing commitment to innovation and progress. I will discuss the history of the company, some of their many products, and their competitors. A problem that the organization has been having will be discussed. And, finally, a question and a hypothesis are stated. Reason for the paper The reason for this research paper on Royal Philips is to identify a problem that is facing the organization and through research and analysis. Researching all areas of the company gives a better understanding of the ethics, financial state, industry and marketShow MoreRelatedAlexander The Great Has Truly Shaped And Inspired The Entire World2294 Words   |  10 PagesAlexander the Great has truly shaped and inspired the entire world as one of the greatest and most successful military leaders in history. Alexander has influenced many writers, as he is included in the national literatures of some eighty countries. At the age of just thirty, Alexander had conquered what was known as oecumene (the inhabited world). Alexander the Great has become worldly recognized and lives on to this day as a modern hero who took on, conquered the world and spread Hellenic cultureRead MoreArt History7818 Words   |  32 Pagesreserved for one family, however the poor would often share o Pharaoh Ââ€" Egyptians Ruler #61607; At first were buried in Mustabas until: #61607; Pharaoh Zosar commissioned Imhotep (worlds first artist) to build him the largest structure in the history of the world o Pyramids #61607; Pg. 52 Ââ€" Step Pyramid of King Zosar • Built in Sacara Ââ€" oldest know cemetery in the world • Sacara is more of a shrine than a cemetery o Was an oasis of greenery o Artificially irrigated o All buildings builtRead MoreEthnic Tourism Essence of India7906 Words   |  32 Pagesstay in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes not related to the exercise of an activity remunerated from within the place visited. India, like many other countries has had a long tradition of religious and spiritual tourism. Our ancestors traveled to the different corners of the sub-continent, sometimes on foot, to visit places of pilgrimage. While the main objective of the pilgrim was to attain communion with the natureRead MoreCase Studies67624 Words   |  271 PagesInternational Airlines Ltd C-105 CASE 8 Beefing up the beefless Mac: McDonald’s expansion strategies in India: C-120 CASE 9 Nucor Corporation and the US steel industry C-128 CASE 10 Pacific Dunlop: Caught on the half volley C-157 CASE 11 Philip Morris C-173 CASE 12 Pisces Group of Singapore C-188 CASE 13 Raffles, Singapore’s historic hotel C-194 CASE 14 Southwest Airlines, 1996 C-205 Introduction Preparing an effective case analysis In most strategic management courses, cases areRead MoreThe Philippine Architecture: Spanish Colonial Period18287 Words   |  74 Pagesknow, the Spaniards’ goal was to conquer places or islands with rich in natural resources to add up to their territory and wealth. Expansion of territory can lead to more power and much money. Having superiority was the main aim of the Spaniards; it was obviously proven through their motto: â€Å"God. Gold. Glory†. History plays a very important role to know more about the intent of the Spaniards in colonizing our island. Without the history, the intent of colonizing the pearl of the orient would not beRead MoreLiberty University Bibl 323 John Module 5 Notes Essay examples11938 Words   |  48 Pagesleads them out. When he has brought out all his own, he goes on ahead of them, and his sheep follow him because they know his voice. But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger’s voice’. Jesus used this figure of speech, but they did not understand what he was telling them.† Introduction A man’s wealth was determined by the size of his flock. Much of the economy throughout the biblical history of Israel was dependantRead MoreGoal Movie Review10720 Words   |  43 Pagesdays watching young lads beat the hell out of each other. But once in a while, there’s one that comes along and lifts your heart.† --Glen Foy in â€Å"Goal! The Dream Begins† GOAL! THE DREAM BEGINS Production Information Like every kid, Santiago Munez has a big dream. But unlike every kid, he’s given the rare opportunity to make that dream come true—if he’s willing to put his fears aside, travel thousands of miles from home, and hold his own with some of the best in the world. The intense pressure andRead MoreThe Human Rights Act and Anti-Terrorism in the Uk: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but Are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat That Has Followed?17827 Words   |  72 PagesPublic Law 2010 The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed? David McKeever Subject: Human rights. Other related subjects: Administrative law. Criminal law Keywords: Administrative law; Freedom of expression; Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Terrorism; Torture Legislation: Human Rights Act 1998 Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 Terrorism Act 2006 Anti-terrorism, Crime and SecurityRead MoreThe Human Rights Act and Anti-Terrorism in the Uk: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but Are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat That Has Followed?17817 Words   |  72 PagesPublic Law 2010 The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed? David McKeever Subject: Human rights. Other related subjects: Administrative law. Criminal law Keywords: Administrative law; Freedom of expression; Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Terrorism; Torture Legislation: Human Rights Act 1998 Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 Terrorism Act 2006 Anti-terrorism, Crime and SecurityRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 PagesBrier, and Roy Rosenzweig Also in this series: Paula Hamilton and Linda Shopes, eds., Oral History and Public Memories Tiffany Ruby Patterson, Zora Neale Hurston and a History of Southern Life Lisa M. Fine, The Story of Reo Joe: Work, Kin, and Community in Autotown, U.S.A. Van Gosse and Richard Moser, eds., The World the Sixties Made: Politics and Culture in Recent America Joanne Meyerowitz, ed., History and September 11th John McMillian and Paul Buhle, eds., The New Left Revisited David M

Marriage Vs Cohabitation Marriage And Cohabitation

Marriage Vs Cohabitation Introduction: The picture of family has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, due to the incline of cohabitation before marriage. Cohabitation is extremely popular and has become quite the trend. When looking at both married and cohabitating couples there are advantages and disadvantages to both, but when one looks at the day to day small things they share some common ground. The Pros of Marriage: The tradition of marriage was intended to keep couples together for the rest of their lives, and offered many other incentives as well. In the beginning, couples stand together publicly committing to one another pledging to stand together through anything. They tie the so-called knot, and they receive an†¦show more content†¦Consequently, the rate of divorce in today’s society has many people running scarred at the idea of marriage. Furthermore, if the relationship does come to an end there are no strings attached, both people can just walk away. Cohabitating couples can also enjoy a few other things like: According to Modern Maturity (1995) â€Å"You can both earn more before your Social security benefits are taxable, or if you make about the same amount, you can save thousands on income taxes through earned income tax credit and supplemental income.† Then there is â€Å"If you each own a home, you can both get the onetime $125,000 capital gains exclusion on the profit from the sale of those residents.† (p. 74). The Cons of Marriage: Often, people enter into marriage with blinders on, and for the wrong reasons. A couple goes into their life together with this elaborate presentation of their love for one another called a wedding. This is usually just a pricey party when it comes down to it. Then, there is the matter of irreconcilable differences, the big nasty divorce. This can also get very costly, between hiring an attorney, and splitting marital assets. Consequently, not all people get married for the right reasons, and this could make it miserable for all who are involved. According to Rhoades, G. (2009). â€Å"Ironically some people who are not good together, getting married because the break up is harder than if they were just dating† (p. 230). When this happens, one can almost guarantee theShow MoreRelatedMarriage And Cohabitation : Marriage Vs Cohabitation1111 Words   |  5 PagesMarriage Vs Cohabitation The picture of family has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, due to the increase of cohabitation before marriage. Cohabitation is extremely popular and has become quite the trend. When looking at both married and cohabiting couples, there are advantages and disadvantages to both, but when one looks at the day-to-day small things they share some common ground. The Pros of Marriage The tradition of marriage was intended to keep couples together for the rest ofRead MoreMarriage Vs. Cohabitation By Christian Taylor1182 Words   |  5 Pages Marriage vs. Cohabitation Christian Taylor Introduction Attention Getter: Has anyone ever considered that before marriage you’re going to cohabit with your partner? Well, from psychology it says people start cohabiting because they enhance the opportunity to see if whether it’s compatible or not. According to statistics it says just over fifty percent of cohabiting couples never marry or if so it increases the divorce chances. With being married there is a greater chance because, statics showsRead MoreCohabitation Between Marriage And Marriage1303 Words   |  6 Pagesnormal and are expected. One of these previously taboo ideas is cohabitation. Cohabitation is the act of living together while in a romantic relationship, prior to marriage. (Steinberg, Bornstein, Vandell, and Rook, p. 450, 2011) More and more couples are cohabitating, according to some studies approximately two-thirds of couples live together before they get married. (Luscombe, 2014) Some couples that lived together before marriage have a strong and hea lthy relationship, while others end in divorceRead MoreEssay On Getting Married And Cohabitation1204 Words   |  5 PagesBikram Bista Prof Mather English 1010 11/12/2017 Getting Married vs cohabitating Cohabitation is an arrangement where a couple who have not married life collectively. Such arrangements have become more and more common in Western nations during the previous few decades, being directed by changing social views, specifically about marriage, gender role, and religion. Whereas getting married is also called wedlock, is a socially accept the union among spouse that builds right and obligation between thoseRead MoreMarriage Or Keeping Your Options Open? Essay1665 Words   |  7 PagesMarriage or Keeping Your Options Open? Is marriage necessary before couples decide to move in together? Or should couples test out the relationship before tying the knot? In the passage, â€Å"Cohabitation Instead of Marriage,† James Q. Wilson discusses the many advantages to marriage compared to the downfalls of cohabitation. How marriage is what maintains a family and how cohabitation s influence on couples is changing American society. He concludes that young couples today are choosing to cohabitRead MoreWomen s Social Issues And Concerns1292 Words   |  6 Pagesthe many developmental tasks during early adulthood. There is also exploring intimate relationships, cohabitation, and marriage, starting a family and belonging to a social group. Because women are fighting to make ends meet there are possibilities that they will not explore the other tasks. More information will be given on the struggles to resolve the psychosocial crisis known as intimacy vs isolation of women living in poverty who are trying to establish a career identity and how counselorsRead Moreterm paper about living together before marriage1464 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿LIVING TOGETHER BEFORE MARRIAGE The human being and their society are always constant motion. In modern life, there are new tendencies which a lot of different than traditional countries appear. One of aspects changed quickly all over the world is love, marriage and family. A flower cannot without sunshine and man cannot live without love. (Max Muller) Love is a sacred and wonderful sentiment. In generation past, marriage and living together forever are a last destination of loveRead More The Effect of Cohabitation on Marriage Essay3030 Words   |  13 Pages Abstract The Effect of Cohabitation on Marriage Several published studies look at the increase in premarital cohabitation and the effect of premarital cohabitation on the traditional marriage relationship from the 1960s to present. Issues considered are marital satisfaction, marital stability, marital communication, and incidents of divorce within each group. Contrary to common perceptions, studies on couples who cohabitated prior to marrying indicate marriages that are less satisfactory, lessRead MorePros And Cons Of Cohabitation1763 Words   |  8 Pagesadult has now plunged into cohabitation. Does it really matter if you cohabitate before marriage? In finding the answer to this problem, I have come across two articles which help explain the pros and the cons of the question, â€Å"Should couples cohabitate or get married?† The first article is Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia, the Premarital Cohabitation Effect. When a couple has â€Å"dedication commitment† (Stanley, Rhoades, and Markmann, 503) with each oth er, cohabitation works for partners. It isRead MorePreventing Divorce And Its Effects On Society3587 Words   |  15 Pagesto be a marriage to consider. To enlighten these two terms; Credo Reference (2013), the widely used database who published their article of Marriage and Divorce in 2013, claims that marriage is a â€Å"social bond or legal contract between persons that establishes kinship, usually sanctified by religious authorities or the state† (Credo Reference, 2013, Page 1). Marriage represents a value in modern day and serves as a purpose of not only love but a commitment. Dating back into what marriage was intended

Affirmitive Action Reverse Discrimination Free Essays

string(121) " for 200 seats which meant that some qualified students were rejected to make way for less Baker 5 qualified minorities\." Baker 1 Jennifer Baker Reverse Discrimination Even though slavery has not been a part of America for over a century now, racial discrimination still exists in various parts of our culture. A controversial policy known as affirmative action was introduced in the 1960’s to try and promote racial equality in society. Affirmative action is supposed to give minorities an equal chance in life by requiring minority employment, promotions, college acceptance, etc. We will write a custom essay sample on Affirmitive Action: Reverse Discrimination or any similar topic only for you Order Now At first this sounds like a perfect solution to racial discrimination, but in reality it is discrimination in reverse. The term â€Å"affirmative action† was first used back in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy in an executive order designed to encourage racially mixed work forces. He stated that contractors should â€Å"take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. † (Affirmative Action) Then in 1964 the Civil Rights Act was passed which prohibited employment discrimination based on race or sex. The Civil Rights activists continued to argue that minorities weren’t going to be able to compete with the more qualified applicants after having suffered discrimination for so long. So in 1969 President Nixon made it a federal policy that a certain percentage of minorities must be hired in the workplace. Quickly affirmative Baker 2 action changed from being a policy that ensured equal opportunity to being one that gave unfair advantages to minorities. Affirmative action has remained controversial throughout the years, finding itself in and out of the courts. One of the most famous cases was Fullilove vs. Klutznick, which took place in 1980. The ruling stated that setting aside 10 percent of the hiring for minorities was constitutional. Fortunately in 1996 proposition 209 was passed in California which ended affirmative action throughout the state. This was definitely a breakthrough, but the effects of affirmative action still linger. Many businesses and corporations still give preference to minorities even if they are less qualified. Employers fear that lawsuits will be filed stating that applicants were turned down because of their race. Renowned author and political activist Nathan Glazer, has been against affirmative action since its beginning. Glazer believes that the olicy became controversial when it went beyond the ideas of the Civil Rights Act and started requiring employers to hire or promote a certain number of minority applicants or employees. In order to make sure that affirmative action was taking place, federal courts started enforcing â€Å"quotas† or â€Å"goals† for specific numbers of minority hiring. If these were met, lawsuits based on racial discrimination would be less valid. Say s Glazer, â€Å"Affirmative action has become a matter of setting statistical goals or quotas by race for employment†¦ the expectations of color blindness that was Baker 3 paramount in the 1960’s has been replaced by a rigid frame of numerical requirements. †(Glazer, 6) Those who oppose quotas and goals are said to be opposers of the Civil Rights Act, even though the affirmative action of today is not what the Civil Rights Act embodied. Glazer compares the misinterpretation of the Civil Rights Act to the desegregation of schools. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that segregated schools were unconstitutional. The idea of racially integrated schools, like racially integrated workplaces, is an excellent one. However, the desegregation of schools has made busing a necessity. Busing, although not in use today, is when students are transferred to another school for purposes of racial integration. It is costly to run all the buses and the commuting is hard on the students. Those opposing busing are said to agree with the segregation of schools. (Glazer, 10) The desegregation of schools was also mentioned in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Initially this seemed a fair proposal, but just as affirmative action became detrimental in the workplaces, integrating minorities in schools turned into numerical requirements. Can you imagine busing programs being used across the United States today? The scary truth is that once one of these ideas is adopted in one city, any other city can then follow suit. For example, if Santa Cruz County were granted the right to require a 15 percent Hispanic student enrollment in all high schools within the county lines, any other city could also put this idea into practice based on precedent. The assignment of students Baker 4 based on race would cause an endless stream of angry parents. Fortunately busing is in the past, but affirmative action still has its claws in the school system. A few weeks ago I was watching a 60 Minutes segment about a white girl who had filed a lawsuit against the University of Michigan claiming that they did not accept her because of her race. She had graduated from high school with a high GPA and had done everything in her power to become qualified for acceptance, yet she was denied admission. Further research showed that the University of Michigan does in fact admit students based on race. When reading applications, they award points according to criteria. For example, if one writes a good essay he is awarded 1 point and if he is a minority he is awarded 20 points. Something is askew. Is being a minority is 20 times more important than one’s scholarly achievements? The University’s argument is that students learn better in a racially diverse environment. UC Davis is another example. In 1988 only 40 percent of Davis’ freshman class had been accepted solely on the basis of merit. While whites or Asian-Americans needed at least a 3. 7 GPA in high school to be accepted, most minority applicants were accepted even though they met much lower standards. Sixty-six percent of the whites graduated while only twenty-seven percent of blacks did. Even as recently as 1997 one was more likely to get accepted into UCLA if he were black or Hispanic than if he were white. The minority students had both lower GPA’s and test scores. There were 5000 applicants for 200 seats which meant that some qualified students were rejected to make way for less Baker 5 qualified minorities. You read "Affirmitive Action: Reverse Discrimination" in category "Papers" (Chances of Admission) This does not sound like an equal society. In 1995 the University of California system voted to end all affirmative action in admissions. When the changes took effect in 1998, minority enrollment went down drastically. This seems prejudicial, but in reality it is fair and allows competition between the best, regardless of race. Everyone has an equal opportunity to receive an education. Public schools are free and it is mandatory that children attend them. Any student can take full advantage of their first 12 years of education and earn the GPA that will gain them admission into a college. If a student is born into a poor family there are scholarships and student loans available. Malcom X is a perfect example of someone choosing to rise up and get an education. Early in his life he made very unwise choices and ended up a pimp. When he was caught and thrown in jail he decided to begin educating himself. All he had was a dictionary but he used that dictionary and copied down every page. He went from being an illiterate street pimp to a very influential political leader. Affirmative action wasn’t around in Malcom’s time, but today everybody knows about it or has at least heard the term used. The first time I heard about affirmative action was when my brother first started working at Ralph’s supermarket. There was a black woman working there who was very slow and unproductive. One day my brother asked a fellow employee why the lady didn’t lose her job and he said, â€Å"She’s here for affirmative action reasons. † It turned out that whenever the lady was scheduled for a shift, another Baker 6 worker was also scheduled just to make up for the inefficiency of the black lady. My brother’s boss feared a lawsuit if he fired her. This is ridiculous! It is a costly arrangement and unfair to the lady hired just to take up slack for someone else’s laziness. The policy of affirmative action basically states that in order to have an integrated society with equal opportunities for all races, minorities must be given an advantage to make up for their disadvantages. This means that less qualified applicants are getting hired and that students who do not meet the requirements for college admission are being accepted while qualified students are being turned away, all based on race. The Constitution bans the exclusion of minorities from anything based on color, therefore it is unconstitutional to exclude whites based on the same principles. The lesson of great decisions of the Supreme Court and the lesson of contemporary history have been the same for at least a generation: discrimination on the basis of race is illegal, immoral, unconstitutional, inherently wrong, and destructive of democratic society. †(Gross, 1) Affirmative action is asking us to overlook all that we’ve learned and even fought for. Since affirmative action is s uch a hot topic and it affects our country as a whole, it’s important to know how the presidential candidates view this subject. Vice President Al Gore tends to favor the policy while Governor George Bush disagrees with it. Gore’s idea is â€Å"mend it, don’t end it. †(Al Gore) He says that affirmative action has done a lot for women and minorities over the years and that to get rid of it would be a waste. He has yet Baker 7 to provide a way to fix it. Bush argues against quotas and goals and proposes an alternative to this policy, one he has used in Texas. He terms his system of ideas and policies â€Å"affirmative access†. (George Bush) His idea leans more towards the original thinking of the Civil Rights Act and promoting equal opportunity. An example is that the top 10 percent of each high school’s graduates be automatically accepted into the college of their choice. Supposedly the idea has been effective over the past couple of years in Texas. Both candidates have good points. Affirmative action has helped reduce minorities’ and women’s suffering prejudices in the workplace and in school, but on the other hand it has been taken to the extreme and the prejudices have been turned around. We need to get back to the heart of what the original affirmative action intended. Racial prejudices need to be eliminated completely. We are all the same on the inside. There is no reason to consider outward appearances. Employers and colleges only need to look at the applicants’ qualifications when determining who will be hired or accepted. Affirmative action could also use a face-lift, like the name change Bush suggested. When the term â€Å"affirmative action† is used, it is looked upon negatively and is associated with discrimination. A law that requires the acceptance of the most qualified would allow competition of the best and eliminate the issues of minority prejudices. If no regard is given to race, as Kennedy intended, then only the most qualified applicant will be accepted. This is fair. Baker 8 Affirmative action has, in a way, become unfair to minorities. What is going to make them strive to be the best by working hard to get that promotion or studying hard to get those grades if they know they have an easy in? It has become an insult to minorities. Affirmative action is basically saying that they are not as smart or as qualified to be in good schools or in good jobs. It is saying that they need special help to get jobs and into colleges. It is a mockery. I know so many smart minority people who will transfer into better colleges than I and I’m as white as they come! I sat next to a girl this semester who was so intelligent and had the most amazing style of writing. She was a mix of Indian and black. We must not insult these people by suggesting that we must compensate for their â€Å"inferiority† to make everyone equal in the eyes of the law. We were all created equal, and anyone, black, white, or any other race, can choose to set higher goals and achieve them just as Malcom X did. The old affirmative action is outdated. The premise that minorities should be given an advantage to make up for their disadvantages is ridiculous and irrelevant. Most of the minorities coming into the work force were born after the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964 and therefore have not suffered disadvantages in school or the workplace. If anything, they have reaped the benefits of affirmative action. California and Texas, as well as a few other states, have begun to take major steps in eliminating affirmative action. It is a start but it needs to spread. We are all equal and absolutely no regard should be given to Baker 9 race in education or employment. It is time to end the old affirmative action. We need a policy that eliminates the issue of race completely. How to cite Affirmitive Action: Reverse Discrimination, Papers